« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

June 2007

June 30, 2007

An interesting thread

It's becoming more rare to come across useful information on the dpreview.com forums.  Understandably, the site is essentially a technical site and attracts comments predominantly from Napoleonesque techie-types. 

Well, today, I found a post that almost devolved into the same technical bickering, but was saved by a comment from the original photographic artist in question.  He quickly put all the technical speculation to bed and gave some inspiring insight in creating great photographs...it isn't done in front of the computer. 

Here's the original post.  Look for Marc Adamus' replies to the thread, specifically this one

June 29, 2007

Pay up or put down that camera!

So much for "land of the free"...

Consider this absurdity being considered in NYC according the the NY Times.

For an interesting discussion on today's NY Times article, go HERE

I would expect as much from the dictatorship formerly know as Chicago, but NYC?!  What a shame. 


June 22, 2007

Diamond in the Rough, Victoria N

I know NOTHING of this photographer other than their profile name on Altphotos.com.  The name could be that of a woman, or that of a place.  For me it doesn't matter.  All that matters is that the photography I am seeing is very special. 

What strikes me most about the photographs I have seen from Victoria N is how casually perfect they are.  Each image seems to have everything in the prefect place to create an image that is pleasing to view, without feeling that this perfection is forced. 

Often I see very good photography, but am at the same time left with a feeling that it's just a little "too perfect."  These all-to perfect compositions taint my experience with the image.  Somehow I find myself "seeing" the image, rather than "feeling the image. 

With Victoria N's imagery, I am "feeling" as much as I am "seeing."  The casual perfection of the images strikes a chord somehow that evokes emotion as well as intellect.  The expected is trumped by something subtly unexpected in the images. 

As is often the case with great art, the experience is difficult to put into words.  So instead, I'll just provide a link the Victoria N's Gallery

June 15, 2007

Provide No Escape! The key to holding viewer interest. Part 2 of 4

In Part 1 of this series, I explored the idea of blown highlights and blocked-up shadows.  Both can be major distractions within an image and both can force the eye to escape the image prematurely. 

Next I want to take on the idea of choosing the appropriate amount of visual information to include in a photograph.  The most common mistake in this area is that of providing too much information.  Let me explain...

 

Too much information

"Fill the frame."  Useful advice, when interpreted correctly. Here's what it doesn't mean: include as much visual information as possible in the image.  Here's what it does mean: Fill the frame with your subject and a minimum amount of supporting detail - NOTHING MORE.  This simple concept, when applied thoughtfully, will provide quantum leaps of improvement in the quality and impact of your photographs. 

Providing the appropriate amount of visual information has two powerful effects on the viewer of an image.  Both of which keep their eye and mind from escaping the image. 

First, by limiting the amount of visual information in the image, you enable the viewer of the image to spend more time on your main subject without distraction.  The result is that the subject receives more attention than it might otherwise. The viewer's eye will spend more time looking at the details of the subject and the context in which you have created the image. 

Second, by simplifying the image, you begin telling a stronger story.  By only including necessary details, you are giving each of these details a stronger voice within your image.  Each detail within the image has more impact as the distractions of "too much information" have been removed.   The old saying "less is more" definitely applies here. 

Now there is a lot of wiggle room with this concept, so lets' look at a couple of examples. 

Noescape5_2

This actually isn't a bad image and might make a fine stock photo (backhanded compliment to myself intended). It has quite a bit of visual information to explore.  Let's see, is that the Ponte Vecchio in the background?  Is he a clothes model of some sort, or do men in Italy actually dress that way?  Do red socks go with a pink sweater?  What's he looking at anyway?  Hopefully you are getting the point.  There is so much going on here, that I can't decide what to look at.  I'm helped by the fact that the man is the only thing in focus, so my eye tends to return there.  But I'm quickly ready to just be done with the image, to escape and look at something else, because I have not been moved enough to consider much beyond just what I have seen in the image.  No questions or stories have been created for me.

Let's move on to an image taken at the same time and place:

Noescape6

POW!  What a difference!  Now we're talking.  By filling the frame with what I consider to be the more interesting parts of the scene, we are capturing the eye (and the mind).  Notice how in this image, you tend to explore the details in much more depth.  Is it possible you didn't even notice the shadow in the first image due to all of the other visual information?  Here the shadow is of primary importance.  Your eye bounces between the shadow and the man, thoughfully, comtemplatingly.  You begin concocting the story behind this person, this place by examining the few elements of visual information you are seeing. Your eye doesn't necessarily want to escape this image.  If anything, it is looking for more.  Excellent!   


OK, one more set of photos, just for fun:

Tmi1_2

I wanted to capture this scene for my Urban Melancholy photo project, but quickly realized that there was just too much going on in the image.  There is no clear subject or story.  So I used the concept of "Isolate and Simplify" to zero in on what it was I was trying to say with this scene.  I re-framed the image so that it included just the right amount of visual information and nothing more.  The result is the image seen below:


Tmi2

I wanted to keep the feeling of being in an abandoned, boarded-up part of town but not have so much visual information in this regard as to detract from the subject of the "expired" parking meter.  By filling the frame, I have an image with more impact and more story.  Less becomes more.  The eye doesn't float around the image looking for a subject as it did in the first image.  I feel as though I have succeeded with providing just the right amount of visual information and created an image with impact magnitudes greater than my first attempt. 

In summary, remember these concepts to avoid providing too much information within an image:

  • Isolate and Simplify
  • Fill the Frame
  • When in doubt, leave it out

Stay tuned for Part 3 of this series, where we will address the issue of Visual Balance & Rhythm. 

June 03, 2007

Meg & Chuck got Married!

Meg and I tied the knot yesterday after 3-1/2 years of dating.  I'm a lucky man to have such a wonderful woman in my life.  It was great having someone else be responsible for the photos.  He just sent me a short slide-show of preliminary shots from the big day.  I thought I would share it:

http://www.jeremyigo.com/meg.html