August 24, 2007

"lost in focus" debuts

I'm excited to be part of a new website featuring the work and commentary of a group of six photographers.  The site was born out of a desire for more meaningful and constructive feedback among photographers who share a common goal.  This goal is one of continual creative exploration. 

Looking among the members, we all have our own style and photographic interests.  At the same time, we all have an obsession with getting better.  This site provides us a forum for doing so.  It is open to feedback from all, so I encourage those who are interested to give it a visit.  I've already captured some new ideas and inspiration from the discussions that are happening there.  I hope you do as well.

Please give a visit to lost in focus

August 13, 2007

Evolution of a Photograph

Tonight's PAD was a quick snapshot of my new bride.  She graciously posed for me (impatiently actually) before heading out for dinner with the girls.  To say that my original raw capture was bad, is to be kind.  Impatient models don't have time for you to figure out white balance and spot metering...and so I was left with this to work with:

_mg_9786raw

Way too dark at ISO 1600 means horrible noise as a result of increasing exposure in my RAW converter (Capture One).  Well after a while in PS doing some touch-up work, I was left with this as my intended post for the day:

_mg_9786finishedsmall2

So that is pretty ordinary.   Since I had some extra time, I decided to play around and try to ruin the image.  I did an OK job of it using the Nik Color Efex "Old Photo" filter and a couple of scratch brushes.  I don't particularly love the result, but at least it's a little less predictable. 

_mg_9786finishedsmall3

After about 20 minutes, I decided I didn't like this ruined version and decided to go with a sepia version....

_mg_9786finishedsmallsepia

After another 20 minutes I decided that the photo looked too digital, so I redid it in B&W and added some grain.  At this point, I decided it was time for bed.

_mg_9786finishedsmallsepiagrain

August 06, 2007

Just a thought

I'm just back from a week long business trip in Boston.  It's lunchtime and I'm surfing my favorite photo websites.  I had a thought I figured I should capture.  It was inspired by a photo posted on Luminous Lanscape.  (one of the best photo resources out there).  Anyway, the photo is of a very mediocre, very predictable landscape. 

So I began to wonder...why did they post this photo on the front page?  Someone obviously liked it.  So I figure, maybe I'm just not looking at it appropriately.  Okay, let me try a little harder to like it.  Well, it's got nice wavy lines, and nice color contrast.  The sky has some interesting clouds...but it's just not doing it for me.

Well, then it hits me.  If I have to look for a reason to like something about an image, it's not really that good.  This isn't to take a shot at someone else's photography.  I created a photo just last week that I have to try really hard to like...so in the end I really don't like it that much at all. 

It's that initial reaction of "wow" that I'm going for with an image.  If it doesn't have that...it doesn't have a chance of being a favorite for long.   Given that I've started back up my PAD, I expect to have MANY photos which do not have this "wow" factor...but sometime soon I'll get one.  And that's the fun of it. 

July 26, 2007

Hmmm, I don't suck at this.

On Monday, I captured a moment of motivation and grabbed my camera bag on the way out the door to walk the dogs.  Along the way, I thought about reasons why I haven't been creating images much lately.  A laundry list of excuses filled my mind: I got married, I am working a lot harder, I'm trying to write a book (not about photography), I'm trying to learn French, I'm just a lazy guy...

What a horribly mediocre way to live; running around with a head full of excuses.  So I spent some time thinking about when I was my most creative with photography.  If I could just put myself back in that place, capture that creative mindset again, I might do some interesting work. 

All of this internal dialog took place within a span of two blocks.  And there I found myself...thinking the unthinkable.  I am going to restart my PAD project on Pbase.   WHAT!?  Yep.  The point at which I was most creative was the point where I was taking my camera out of the bag every day.  I was always looking for photographs, thinking about photographs, or reading about photographs.  Most importantly, I was constantly making photographs. 

So I started my PAD on Monday.  I have given myself a little wiggle room to not necessarily post a photo everyday, but I am thinking seriously about tightening that up.  I will post another photo tonight.  A photo I have not taken yet, or even thought about. 

Just for fun, I went back and compared my very first PAD photo from March of 2005 to the one I created Monday (more than two years later).   And I thought "hmmm, I don't suck at this."

Pad2005

PAD, March 1, 2005 (a bit embarrassing, but this is where is started)

 

Pad2007

PAD, July 23, 2007

July 03, 2007

Concert Photography - What I learned on My First Try

Themodclub_2

It was 9:30am on a Wednesday when my plane lurched into the air.  I had two hours of uninterrupted time to think.  The flight from Charlotte to Toronto always surprises me with it's brevity.  OK, time to get down to business.  How the heck am I going to shoot concert photos.  What are my shooting conditions going to be like?

And so that's how my day started, on May the 23rd, as I made my way to see the big CD Release Party for the Year of the Monkey 68 project that my friend Ron had been working on for two years.   I just couldn't miss this party.  Plus, heck, I really wanted to try my hand at shooting concert photos.  Since I was "with the band," I knew this was going to give me a rare opportunity to get right up to the stage and do whatever the heck I wanted. 

As the clouds passed by underneath, I put together a list of challenges that I would have to deal with:

  • low-light shooting conditions
  • extreme backlighting
  • ever-changing lighting conditions
  • ever-changing light color
  • unpredictable subject movement
  • inability to see exposure settings well with crowd and lighting issues
  • lack of time to think much about exposure issues after the concert starts

Hmm, this is definitely not an environment I had any experience with.   I was going to have to learn quickly.  It dawned on me that my best chance at getting good photos was to allow myself to be free of exposure concerns and just spend my time finding the best compositions.  To do this meant that I had to automate the exposure as much as possible.  After careful consideration, here were my decisions:

  • Set the ISO to 1600.  The 5D has amazing low-light quality and this was one instance where I was going to need it.  To capture a moving subject, I needed a higher shutter speed to avoid motion blur.   A high ISO was my only option.
  • Set the metering mode to "center-weighted".  This is a great metering mode for backlit subjects.
  • Leave the 24-105mm lens in the bag and shoot the whole concert with the 85mm f1.2 lens --  I decided that I wanted to separate the individuals I was shooting from the background on a small stage, and only the way to do this was with the shallow depth-of-field offered by the 85mm lens.  It would also make things simple for me as far as composition, because I would have only one focal length, I would have to move myself around to change the look of the images.  Since I had free reign to do so, I decided this was a good option.
  • Set the exposure dial to Aperture Priority mode and try to keep the aperture around f2.2-f3.5.  This will give me sufficient depth of field and terrific sharpness, while softly blurring the background.
  • Set the shooting mode to "continuous" so that I could rapid fire images when I needed to. 
  • Remove the UV filter.  With all of these lights coming from all these angles, the UV filter would definitely cause a flare or ghosting problem. 
  • Put all the extra CF cards and batteries in my jeans pockets, so that I wouldn't have to lug my bag around with me or miss a critical moment because I had to chase down my camera bag and make these changes. 

As my plane touched down in Toronto, I was feeling pretty confident about shooting at the concert that night.  I'd pretty much left myself only a couple of issues that would have to be dealt with on the spot.  These were:

  • white balance
  • exposure compensation

Well, luck was shining on me this day.  After spending 40 minutes in an alley shooting some portrait photos, I hung out in the club and listened to the band doing their sound check.  The lucky part was that the lighting guys were also doing their thing, so I had a full 30 minute practice session with my camera.  I shot photos of the singers under the same type of lighting conditions I would see later that evening.  This practice was helpful in a number of ways.

First, it confirmed that I would definitely need 1600 ISO to get the shutter speeds I wanted at the f.2.2-f3.5 settings I was after.  Second, I realized (yet again) that nothing looks more beautiful than a portrait style photo with the 85mm lens.  Third, I was amazed at just how well the center-weighted metering handled the backlight.  It wasn't perfect, but was easily corrected with EV adjustments.   Fourth, I realized that the many colored lights were going to make accurate white balance an impossibility.

Lucky for me, there was a 4-camera video crew at the show setting up to create a DVD of the event.  Knowing how friendly Canadians tend to be, I just wandered right over and asked them in my ignorant southern drawl "do y'all have to set white balance for these cameras?"  Minutes later, I had one of them holding up a huge white card blasted with rays from a big tungsten concert light they had brought with them for just this purpose.  Problem solved.  My white balance was set for the evening.  Thank you video crew.

Now I only had two things to think about while shooting.  Composition and EV compensation.  Heck, it's time for a beer, I can do those things with one hand tied behind my back.

So, after a few beers, here's how it all went down.  I wandered from the balcony to right in front of the stage to get multiple angles of each singer as they performed.  I would adjust the EV up or down based on skin color/outfit to make sure the center-weighted metering was accurate.  Other than that, I wasn't having to think much at all about exposure settings.  I spent all of my time thinking about where to take the shots from.  I wanted to isolate the singers as much as possible, but not always.  I came away with a handful of shots that I am happy with.  Here are a couple, with the settings included.   (click on images for full-sized version)


1/250 sec, f3.5, -1/3EV

_lindiortega


1/400 sec, f3.2, +-0EV

_joelparisian2



1/320 sec, f4.0, -2EV

_tarasloane


1/125sec, f2.8, -1EV

Tomiswick2


1/320, f3.5, -1EV

_andystochansky



1/160, f2.2, -1 2/3EV

_kobejames


Some of the things I learned from this outing that I would do differently:

  • I would include more shots with a crowd in the foreground
  • I would try to get more shots of the band members individually
  • I would make sure to get multiple angles of every singer and band member

To see more from this photo shoot, you can visit my gallery HERE.  To hear some of the music from the CD visit the Year of the Monkey My Space Site.  To BUY the CD (complete with my photos on the front & back cover!) visit the Official YOTM Site. 

June 30, 2007

An interesting thread

It's becoming more rare to come across useful information on the dpreview.com forums.  Understandably, the site is essentially a technical site and attracts comments predominantly from Napoleonesque techie-types. 

Well, today, I found a post that almost devolved into the same technical bickering, but was saved by a comment from the original photographic artist in question.  He quickly put all the technical speculation to bed and gave some inspiring insight in creating great photographs...it isn't done in front of the computer. 

Here's the original post.  Look for Marc Adamus' replies to the thread, specifically this one

June 29, 2007

Pay up or put down that camera!

So much for "land of the free"...

Consider this absurdity being considered in NYC according the the NY Times.

For an interesting discussion on today's NY Times article, go HERE

I would expect as much from the dictatorship formerly know as Chicago, but NYC?!  What a shame. 


June 22, 2007

Diamond in the Rough, Victoria N

I know NOTHING of this photographer other than their profile name on Altphotos.com.  The name could be that of a woman, or that of a place.  For me it doesn't matter.  All that matters is that the photography I am seeing is very special. 

What strikes me most about the photographs I have seen from Victoria N is how casually perfect they are.  Each image seems to have everything in the prefect place to create an image that is pleasing to view, without feeling that this perfection is forced. 

Often I see very good photography, but am at the same time left with a feeling that it's just a little "too perfect."  These all-to perfect compositions taint my experience with the image.  Somehow I find myself "seeing" the image, rather than "feeling the image. 

With Victoria N's imagery, I am "feeling" as much as I am "seeing."  The casual perfection of the images strikes a chord somehow that evokes emotion as well as intellect.  The expected is trumped by something subtly unexpected in the images. 

As is often the case with great art, the experience is difficult to put into words.  So instead, I'll just provide a link the Victoria N's Gallery

June 15, 2007

Provide No Escape! The key to holding viewer interest. Part 2 of 4

In Part 1 of this series, I explored the idea of blown highlights and blocked-up shadows.  Both can be major distractions within an image and both can force the eye to escape the image prematurely. 

Next I want to take on the idea of choosing the appropriate amount of visual information to include in a photograph.  The most common mistake in this area is that of providing too much information.  Let me explain...

 

Too much information

"Fill the frame."  Useful advice, when interpreted correctly. Here's what it doesn't mean: include as much visual information as possible in the image.  Here's what it does mean: Fill the frame with your subject and a minimum amount of supporting detail - NOTHING MORE.  This simple concept, when applied thoughtfully, will provide quantum leaps of improvement in the quality and impact of your photographs. 

Providing the appropriate amount of visual information has two powerful effects on the viewer of an image.  Both of which keep their eye and mind from escaping the image. 

First, by limiting the amount of visual information in the image, you enable the viewer of the image to spend more time on your main subject without distraction.  The result is that the subject receives more attention than it might otherwise. The viewer's eye will spend more time looking at the details of the subject and the context in which you have created the image. 

Second, by simplifying the image, you begin telling a stronger story.  By only including necessary details, you are giving each of these details a stronger voice within your image.  Each detail within the image has more impact as the distractions of "too much information" have been removed.   The old saying "less is more" definitely applies here. 

Now there is a lot of wiggle room with this concept, so lets' look at a couple of examples. 

Noescape5_2

This actually isn't a bad image and might make a fine stock photo (backhanded compliment to myself intended). It has quite a bit of visual information to explore.  Let's see, is that the Ponte Vecchio in the background?  Is he a clothes model of some sort, or do men in Italy actually dress that way?  Do red socks go with a pink sweater?  What's he looking at anyway?  Hopefully you are getting the point.  There is so much going on here, that I can't decide what to look at.  I'm helped by the fact that the man is the only thing in focus, so my eye tends to return there.  But I'm quickly ready to just be done with the image, to escape and look at something else, because I have not been moved enough to consider much beyond just what I have seen in the image.  No questions or stories have been created for me.

Let's move on to an image taken at the same time and place:

Noescape6

POW!  What a difference!  Now we're talking.  By filling the frame with what I consider to be the more interesting parts of the scene, we are capturing the eye (and the mind).  Notice how in this image, you tend to explore the details in much more depth.  Is it possible you didn't even notice the shadow in the first image due to all of the other visual information?  Here the shadow is of primary importance.  Your eye bounces between the shadow and the man, thoughfully, comtemplatingly.  You begin concocting the story behind this person, this place by examining the few elements of visual information you are seeing. Your eye doesn't necessarily want to escape this image.  If anything, it is looking for more.  Excellent!   


OK, one more set of photos, just for fun:

Tmi1_2

I wanted to capture this scene for my Urban Melancholy photo project, but quickly realized that there was just too much going on in the image.  There is no clear subject or story.  So I used the concept of "Isolate and Simplify" to zero in on what it was I was trying to say with this scene.  I re-framed the image so that it included just the right amount of visual information and nothing more.  The result is the image seen below:


Tmi2

I wanted to keep the feeling of being in an abandoned, boarded-up part of town but not have so much visual information in this regard as to detract from the subject of the "expired" parking meter.  By filling the frame, I have an image with more impact and more story.  Less becomes more.  The eye doesn't float around the image looking for a subject as it did in the first image.  I feel as though I have succeeded with providing just the right amount of visual information and created an image with impact magnitudes greater than my first attempt. 

In summary, remember these concepts to avoid providing too much information within an image:

  • Isolate and Simplify
  • Fill the Frame
  • When in doubt, leave it out

Stay tuned for Part 3 of this series, where we will address the issue of Visual Balance & Rhythm. 

June 03, 2007

Meg & Chuck got Married!

Meg and I tied the knot yesterday after 3-1/2 years of dating.  I'm a lucky man to have such a wonderful woman in my life.  It was great having someone else be responsible for the photos.  He just sent me a short slide-show of preliminary shots from the big day.  I thought I would share it:

http://www.jeremyigo.com/meg.html